Saturday, July 30, 2011
Facebook and RenRen
Chinese Government Buries Train
The Chinese government has lost a lot of credibility due to the recent train crash.
The recent high-speed rail accident in which more than 100 people died shows that the bureaucracy in China has not changed in spite of its fast economic development and modernization.
In a civilized country, if such an accident occurred, the accident site would be roped off and a careful and detailed investigation performed. The Chinese government did something different. They cleared the area right after the accident and then dug a big hole to bury the train pieces in. The Department of Central Media, the State Council limited news reports. The department asked the media to report this news based on the principle of “in the face of tragedy, there is great love.” It asked media “not to question, not to investigate, not to conjecture.” All news items should be in line with the reports from the government. The State Department of Railroads is now negotiating with victims’ families. According to the department’s rule, compensation is limited to US$140K (only just recently increased from a mere US$80K).
Part of the reason the Chinese government did not want too much information on the crash to get out was that they were afraid of losing investment in future railway expansion. However, as the demand for quick transportation is so great, and with Japanese railway systems as the only alternative, high-speed rail construction will likely continue at full speed.
Friday, July 29, 2011
Problems with Chinese Growth
In the past two years, China has risen quickly in the world. Its economy overtook Germany and became the third largest in the world in 2009 according to data released in early 2010 by IMF. In 2010, China became the second largest, overtaking Japan. With China’s fast growth, many people are wondering if China will overtake the US.
However, many economists inside China feel uneasy about China’s “on-paper” improvement. The Chinese government, recognizing the fast growth of the country, has always maintained long-term economic goals. To achieve these goals, the Chinese government sets minimum production requirements for all cities, provinces, and towns. Many local governments try to achieve these goals through any means. For example, after the 2008 financial crisis, the central government commanded local governments to spend money and increase the GDP. Some city governments spent money on road maintenance by destroying the roads and then paving the roads again. Since all land is owned by government, some local governments made multiple transactions on one piece of land to increase GDP.
According to Chinese economists, the government cannot expect their economy to keep rising as the world’s economy suffers since the Chinese economy relies heavily on foreign consumption. Also, even though China has become the second largest economy, its GDP per capita is still one tenth of Japan’s. Lastly, China’s large GDP growth is matched by heavy sacrifices in other areas. Pollution, corruption, and unfair competition by SOE’s (state-owned enterprise) have become grave. The Beijing think-tank has advised the government that China’s economy is on the verge of falling into the “middle-income trap.” The argument says that because China was already a lower-middle-income country last year, with a GDP per person of around $4,400, it might go through the same stagnation and turbulence as Latin American economies did in the 1980s and 1990s. The think-tank also argues that China follows extensive-growth, which is based on the expansion of the quantity of inputs in order to increase the quantity of outputs. Without innovation and technology, the extensive-growth in China is likely to experience diminishing returns and eventually reach stagnation.
However, even if the government wants to slow down, it needs to be done carefully. Due to the extensive-growth pattern, if the Chinese government decides to slow production, all economic activities, driven by investment, will also slow down. Additionally, the social conflict, especially the conflict between people and government, has been getting more and more serious. If economic development slows down, employment and social security problems will become even more severe, potentially causing social turmoil.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
A Crisis of Trust
Recently, many companies were forced to take their stocks off the market because of credibility problems. Since March, five Chinese companies were dismissed from the U.S. stock market, and 15 companies were asked to stop transactions.
Because of the credibility concerns, some stock trading companies have already prohibited using loans to buy more than 130 stocks. The U.S. listed Chinese companies are facing a trust crisis. Many companies are under suspicion for faking financial statements. Also, the SEC said they are investigating the financial statements of the Chinese companies listed on the U.S. stock market who have entered by merging with U.S. companies.
Since this year, it’s become a trend in the U.S. to question listed Chinese companies. These companies may be questionable because they withhold some information, don’t abide by transaction rules, or are in questionable financial condition.
Among those companies who were asked to stop transactions, one of them was asked less than two months after the company went IPO.
Because lots of Chinese companies are in trouble, many stock trading companies have already begun shorting those companies. Two of them are Muddy Waters Research and Citron Research. Interestingly enough, these two research institutes investigate fraudulent companies and also short stocks at the same time. It is no surprise that they are doing quite well.
Fraud in China is not limited to corporations. Not long ago, investigation by the National Statistics Bureau revealed a large number of plagiarized research papers among Chinese scholars. In the patent industry, inventors in China will often divide up a single invention into dozens of patents for each part in order to get tax exemptions and to appear more innovative. Chinese banks in the past have also distorted their financial reports to make themselves seem profitable.
Clearly, a decade ago, it was the trend to question the quality of Chinese manufactured goods. Now that China has entered the financial sector, their companies are also coming under suspicion.